<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Robin Hood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.florian-knorn.com/2009/01/robin-hood.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.florian-knorn.com/2009/01/robin-hood.html</link>
	<description>This blog now shows some bits and pics from my photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 20:31:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florian</title>
		<link>http://www.florian-knorn.com/2009/01/robin-hood.html/comment-page-1#comment-8345</link>
		<dc:creator>Florian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.florian-knorn.com/?p=374#comment-8345</guid>
		<description>Here are two links on the topic (&lt;a href=&quot;http://photo.net/learn/raw/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAW_image_format&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;). Especially the third figure of the first link says a lot.

Basically, shooting RAW means that you store the raw image sensor data, virtually untouched (but losslessly compressed, of course!). Creating a JPG out of the large amount of &lt;i&gt;information&lt;/i&gt; captured by the sensor corresponds to throwing away a ton of information and involves many destructive operations.

Taking home the RAW file, however, means that you get to choose what you do with the files, you can properly adjust the white balance, do some highlight / shadow recovery, exposure adjustments, dynamic compression, etc. to a much, much larger extend than would be possible with a JPG.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are two links on the topic (<a href="http://photo.net/learn/raw/" rel="nofollow">1</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAW_image_format" rel="nofollow">2</a>). Especially the third figure of the first link says a lot.</p>
<p>Basically, shooting RAW means that you store the raw image sensor data, virtually untouched (but losslessly compressed, of course!). Creating a JPG out of the large amount of <i>information</i> captured by the sensor corresponds to throwing away a ton of information and involves many destructive operations.</p>
<p>Taking home the RAW file, however, means that you get to choose what you do with the files, you can properly adjust the white balance, do some highlight / shadow recovery, exposure adjustments, dynamic compression, etc. to a much, much larger extend than would be possible with a JPG.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ulf</title>
		<link>http://www.florian-knorn.com/2009/01/robin-hood.html/comment-page-1#comment-8344</link>
		<dc:creator>Ulf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.florian-knorn.com/?p=374#comment-8344</guid>
		<description>What is the advantage of storing pictures as RAW data instead of compressing them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the advantage of storing pictures as RAW data instead of compressing them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

